![]() |
Whoa, a review, at this late date - Printable Version +- Drunkard's Walk Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums) +-- Forum: The Drunkard's Walk (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +--- Forum: Drunkard's Walk II: Robot's Rules of Order (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Thread: Whoa, a review, at this late date (/showthread.php?tid=1263) |
Whoa, a review, at this late date - Bob Schroeck - 10-01-2008 The following showed up on the FFML a couple nights ago in what amounted to an anonymous posting thanks to what appears to be a massive mailglitch caused (or maybe not) by the sender's attempt to send an HTML-formatted message. I managed to extract it, but I haven't had time since then to even read my mail, let alone respond to it. I appreciated it greatly, though; unfortunately I have no idea (yet) who actually sent it, so I'm just going to post it here and give my very public thanks for the kind words. (And when life finally gives me a chance to get back to my email, I will send a more detailed response via the FFML.) Quote: With all the talk about Drunkard's Walk V going around, I decided to-- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - Evil Midnight Lurker - 10-01-2008 I'd like to have a few words with you about Signs... ![]() --Sam "This is graveness." - Black Aeronaut - 10-02-2008 *Snrk!* - Bob Schroeck - 10-02-2008 Believe you me, if I were an alias for Shyamalan, I'd want to have words with myself over Signs. -- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - David Lewis - 10-03-2008 "4. The way he manages to go into Looney Toon's history without ever actually going into it. This guy can turn a phrase so well that he can give us an entire flashback scene without ever having to WRITE the durn thing." Couldn't have said it better myself. - Bob Schroeck - 10-03-2008 Thank you. -- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - ECSNorway - 10-03-2008 It also touched off a brief flamewar on the topic of the appropriateness of pure-ASCII vs HTML text in email. (The item was originally sent as an HTML attachment to the email, and the ML software scrubs such things automatically.) -- Sucrose Octanitrate. Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode. - Bob Schroeck - 10-03-2008 Joy. I get to erase the entire flamewar in one go when I finally get to read my email tonight. -- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - ECSNorway - 10-03-2008 Yep. The opposing sides: 1) Pure ascii is outdated. We should go to 100% HTML. 2) HTML is overblown and overrated and can carry trojans and viruses. Email has always been pure ASCII and should stay that way. -- Sucrose Octanitrate. Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode. - Sweno - 10-04-2008 Dealing with spam all day long, I fall firmly into camp #2. If you can not convey your message in plain unformatted text, you need to rethink your message. I won't be such a hard-ass about pure ASCII, cause support for extended character sets is a good thing. But yes, I despise html formated email with a passion. -Terry ----- "so listen up boy, or pornography starring your mother will be the second worst thing to happen to you today" TF2: Spy - Black Aeronaut - 10-04-2008 I don't usually have that sort of problem with HTML email as the only version of that that I get tends to be in the form of notices of purchases and such that I make online. - robkelk - 10-04-2008 HTML spam often includes 1x1pixel images with "confirmation codes" in them - this shows which e-mail addresses actually received and opened the messages, thus showing which addresses are valid. That's a rather blatant security hole in HTML e-mail. One that's been closed by the "do not automatically load images" option in most but not all modern e-mail clients (yes, Apple, I'm glaring at you), true, but a heck of a lot of people still run legacy e-mail clients because they came with the computers... -- Rob Kelk "Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of the same sovereign, servants of the same law." - Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012 |