+- Drunkard's Walk Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums)
+-- Forum: General (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Politics and Other Fun (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Thread: Korean Conflict to Finally End? (/showthread.php?tid=12850)
Pages:
1
2
Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Bob Schroeck - 04-17-2018
Multiple news sources are reporting that North and South Korea will be declaring a permanent end to the state of war which has existed between them since 1950, and defortifying the DMZ.
CNBC
USA Today
Bloomberg.com
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 04-17-2018
They're all citing the same story in South Korea's Munwha Ilbo newspaper, who got it from an unnamed official.
So... I want this to be true, but I won't hold my breath waiting.
EDIT: And there's no mention of this in AP's story "Trump to host Japan's Abe at Mar-a-Lago amid strain over North Korea, tariffs"
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Rajvik - 04-17-2018
North Korea is still under economic sanctions for their testing of missiles over the Sea of Japan. A peace treaty ending the Korean War will not change that. That said, i'll believe it when i see the DMZ come down and the North NOT try to invade the south
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 04-18-2018
Reuters has confirmation from named people that this process is happening.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Pyeknu - 04-18-2018
We'll see. We'll see...
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 04-23-2018
South Korea shuts off propaganda blasts as 2 sides near summit talks
Because who can have a meaningful conversation over all that noise?
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Rajvik - 04-24-2018
And yet the North is still running theirs
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - hazard - 04-24-2018
Of course they are.
They are no more sincere than any other dictatorship.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Black Aeronaut - 04-26-2018
Also, I hear that the North is showing absolutely no signs of putting away their big boy toys.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 04-26-2018
Well, it looks like they've closed their nuke research facility. (Apparently because the mountain collapsed from being blown up too many times, but still.)
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Black Aeronaut - 04-27-2018
Pffft!
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Bob Schroeck - 04-27-2018
Well. Looks like it's really happening. Either that, or the Norks are putting on a real good show for some reason.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - SilverFang01 - 04-27-2018
I am glad that this is happening and hopefully it will lead to some measure of peace.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Dartz - 04-27-2018
The border will open.
Millions will start to stream across to the South seeking food and a better life.
Landmines in the DMZ will be removed soon after.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Bob Schroeck - 04-27-2018
More than one commentator has noted that the Koreas have reached this point several times before, only to have things blow up over trivial issues. I would love to see this come to pass, but the question still remains -- what does the absolute dictator of the North expect to get out of it? He can't seriously be expecting to be put in charge of both Koreas, and I think it's unlikely he's simply going to yield power.
Then again, and this is an odd thought I had, he's young, he's been educated in the West, and he's only been in power for a few years, which have been... messy. Could it be he is more tired of the regime than invested in it? Could the various purges he's made in the last few years have been preparation for something like this, instead of consolidating his power for the long run? Honestly, I don't think so, but if I squint and tilt my head, I could just about see it being possible.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Labster - 04-27-2018
Maybe Kim Jong Un is taking advantage of the fact that he's no longer in the running for "world's craziest world leader" these days.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - SilverFang01 - 05-01-2018
A discussion of the possible underlying preferences that drive Kim Jung Un’s recent overtures.
Quote:Kim has more concrete goals that are evident in North Korea’s word and deed, and that happen to also propel North Korea toward the meta-goal of unification, but on terms favorable to the North. Kim has sought to 1) secure his rule against internal challengers, 2) achieve and demonstrate a reliable nuclear deterrent, 3) improve his people’s quality of life, and 4) elevate North Korea’s international standing as a nuclear state. Until very recently, his priority has been the first two goals. Having made significant progress on them, with his current charm offensive, Kim is now aiming to do the same for the latter two.
What Kim Jong Un Wants From Trump
Quote:The point is that Kim’s diplomacy is a progression of Kim’s strategy. Claiming that it’s the result of South Korea’s negotiating savvy or Trump’s maximum pressure campaign ensures only that Trump shows up to meet Kim with eyes wide shut about his counterpart’s motivations. Trump might be perfectly happy to ignore the ultimate price and trade-offs of a deal as long as it generates favorable news headlines. But what about the rest of America?
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 05-01-2018
It's been pointed out to me that the two Koreas previously made it to this stage of negotiations in 2007 and 2000.
I also see that some people who really should know better are suggesting Trump get the Nobel Peace Prize for this. (C'mon, folks, peace hasn't broken out yet. It's far too premature to talk about anybody getting the Peace Prize for this.)
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Rajvik - 05-01-2018
Rob, they gave Obama the Nobel for what he might due, at this point the nomination committee has long since lost any relevancy
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - hazard - 05-02-2018
(05-01-2018, 07:46 PM)Rajvik Wrote: Rob, they gave Obama the Nobel for what he might due, at this point the nomination committee has long since lost any relevancy
Last I checked the committee was very unhappy with that error in judgement, and have taken to more stringent standards when it comes to awarding the peace price.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Rajvik - 05-02-2018
And yet to my knowledge the committee has never rescinded the award, nor asked for its return.
I will admit I have no knowledge of them ever doing so, but if there was ever a case for it, the Obama award would be it.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 05-02-2018
(05-01-2018, 07:46 PM)Rajvik Wrote: Rob, they gave Obama the Nobel for what he might due, at this point the nomination committee has long since lost any relevancy
Citation needed. Wikipedia currently says the exact opposite of what you've stated here.
(05-02-2018, 06:39 PM)Rajvik Wrote: And yet to my knowledge the committee has never rescinded the award, nor asked for its return.
I will admit I have no knowledge of them ever doing so, but if there was ever a case for it, the Obama award would be it.
Why should they rescind it? What is the case for doing so?
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Labster - 05-02-2018
As an Obama voter, I was thought it was a joke when I first heard he won the Nobel. Actually, it still seems like a joke.
But Trump, he's basically disqualified from getting a Nobel because he's so weak on foreign policy that every country now knows it's okay to use chemical weapons on their own citizens.
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - Rajvik - 05-02-2018
Rob, here is what Wikipedia says, sounds like what I said to me, tie- utter horse hooey
https://www.google.com/search?q=article+Obama+to+receive+Nobel+Peace+Prize&client=tablet-android-att-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8&inm=vs#tts=0
RE: Korean Conflict to Finally End? - robkelk - 05-03-2018
Rajvik, that's the article that I linked to. Where in that article does it say anything that supports your view?