Quote:The Department has a long-standing practice in which political appointees set broad policies that line prosecutors apply to individual cases. That practice exists to animate the constitutional principles regarding the even-handed application of the law. Although there are times when political leadership appropriately weighs in on individual prosecutions, it is unheard of for the Department’s top leaders to overrule line prosecutors, who are following established policies, in order to give preferential treatment to a close associate of the President, as Attorney General Barr did in the Stone case. It is even more outrageous for the Attorney General to intervene as he did here — after the President publicly condemned the sentencing recommendation that line prosecutors had already filed in court.

Such behavior is a grave threat to the fair administration of justice. In this nation, we are all equal before the law. A person should not be given special treatment in a criminal prosecution because they are a close political ally of the President. Governments that use the enormous power of law enforcement to punish their enemies and reward their allies are not constitutional republics; they are autocracies.

We welcome Attorney General Barr’s belated acknowledgment that the DOJ’s law enforcement decisions must be independent of politics; that it is wrong for the President to interfere in specific enforcement matters, either to punish his opponents or to help his friends; and that the President’s public comments on DOJ matters have gravely damaged the Department’s credibility. But Mr. Barr’s actions in doing the President’s personal bidding unfortunately speak louder than his words. Those actions, and the damage they have done to the Department of Justice’s reputation for integrity and the rule of law, require Mr. Barr to resign.

(02-16-2020, 07:55 PM)robkelk Wrote: It is unheard-of for a bureaucrat to say something like this about a political appointee. Usually the damage that a political appointee does is worked around, not brought out into the open for everyone to see.

And the letter was signed by bureaucrats on both sides of the political divide.

(02-16-2020, 09:50 PM)Rajvik Wrote: bureaucrats, while granted they are citizens as well, they have made it clear that their allegiance is to the state and not the citizenry.

(02-16-2020, 09:50 PM)Rajvik Wrote: Add to this that the "Line Prosecutors" tried to pull a fast one by telling their superiors one thing while sending something COMPLETELY different to the judge in question, iit's at best a bad faith argument.

(02-17-2020, 05:56 AM)Star Ranger4 Wrote: And, to be honest, Hazard, the thought that the line workers (prosecutors, in this case) said one thing to their political supervisors while recommending to the people who actually made the decision something that aligns with the spirit of the law (if not the letter)...  Gives me hope?