Nation Defence Authorisation Act - Printable Version +- Drunkard's Walk Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums) +-- Forum: General (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Politics and Other Fun (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Nation Defence Authorisation Act (/showthread.php?tid=3867) |
Nation Defence Authorisation Act - Jinx999 - 12-07-2011 I found this link on a legal blog and they're not happy about it. - robkelk - 12-07-2011 Anybody have a link to the text of the actual bill? I'd rather make an informed comment than go by what the pundits and special-interest groups are saying... -- Rob Kelk "Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of the same sovereign, servants of the same law." - Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012 - Dartz - 12-07-2011 Ah.... internment without trial. Didn't work for the last empire that tried it.... ________________________________ --m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig? - Jinx999 - 12-07-2011 Bill Text 1 Link 2 3rd Link - robkelk - 12-08-2011 Jinx999 Wrote:Link 2That's the one that's actually on a .gov website... (looks) Ouch – 46 Titles, 682 pages. What are the sections that people are complaining about (by title), again? On a quick skim, I didn't see anything they haven't already got, but my eyes were starting to glaze over before I was halfway through the contents. -- Rob Kelk "Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of the same sovereign, servants of the same law." - Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012 - Jinx999 - 12-08-2011 Acording to my original source (Lowering the Bar, written by a lawer)something about "Senate Amendment 1456" His article on it. |