Going over the Cliff - Printable Version +- Drunkard's Walk Forums (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums) +-- Forum: General (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Politics and Other Fun (http://www.accessdenied-rms.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Thread: Going over the Cliff (/showthread.php?tid=3909) |
Going over the Cliff - ordnance11 - 01-01-2013 Well. it looks like the House Republicans have decided to let sequestration come into effect. Here's what happens to me personally: 1. I come in the morning, get my matching orders, drop everything I have into the office that I signed for. And then we lock the office down. 2. Get the last paycheck due to me next Friday. 3. Hopefully we go back to work by the 7th and Congress decided to pay us for the lost time. It's depressing but at the same time not surprising. Democracy is truly a terrible form of government. Except there's nothing else better. Oh, and Happy New Year. Ugh! __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - Dartz - 01-01-2013 In other words, how to make sure tax increases and spending cuts go through that appeal to both parties while at the same time allowing neither to take responsibility for them. Meanwhile, whoever swoops in to fix the mess by 'compromising' makes a political killing by 'fixing the crisis'. Sometimes I like my government. It can do things fast. Sometimes it does the wrong thing, but at least it does something. When it has to. ________________________________ --m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig? - ordnance11 - 01-01-2013 When a significant faction of one party decides they'd rather be "pure" and winning the primary is a sure fire way to stay in power..*shrug* __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - khagler - 01-01-2013 There are no spending cuts in the sense that normal people use the words. When politicians in the US talk about spending cuts, they're actually talking about a smaller spending increase. For example, if they were going to increase spending in the next year by $5 trillion, and instead decide to increase it by $4.99 trillion, that constitutes a "spending cut" in politician-speak. Well looks like I go back to work - ordnance11 - 01-01-2013 Well we went over the cliff..with a deal in hand, Back to work. __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - ordnance11 - 09-21-2013 And we're back right were we started from. I am now utterly convinced that the Tea Baggers, the people who support them and the people who voted for them are hooked on something. Obamacare was judged constitutional, the president won a second term with control of the Senate. The had their chance and they lost. So now they'll bring the government shutdown unless the president defunds his signature first term achievement. They're crazy if they think the president they'll agree to it and they're even more crazier if they think there will be no backlash to the GOP from this. I am willing to bet that this will the moment when the GOP starts ceases to be a national party. Either the koooks decide to form a splinter party or the sane people forms another party. Might be even both. __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - Black Aeronaut - 09-21-2013 It's looking pretty bad here in Texas. I haven't heard the official word yet, but Wendy Davis, the Democrat famous for her marathon filibuster in the state senate against the abortion bill, may run for Governor. And the Republican political machine is already gearing up for what is looking to be the nastiest bout of mudslinging in the State's history. And to top it all off, Mr. 'Good Hair' Perry is trying to make the roll out of Obama Care in Texas as difficult as possible. I pray that this is merely the last gasp of his political career, because I seriously doubt he's gonna get elected to anything after this. - Morganite - 09-21-2013 Given the way the polls show more and more people don't want Obamacare, wouldn't you expect opposing it to be good for someone's political career? Seriously, wouldn't you think that if people wanted Obamacare funded that badly, the Democrats would control the House? Why is it all that surprising when Republicans do what their constituents want? -Morgan. - Rajvik - 09-22-2013 Actually, and i say this as one of those "Kooks", let them shut the government down, unlike what the democrats and the talking heads of the liberal media, (and 99.9% of the US media is liberal biased mind you) would have you believe, shutting down the government is not going to end the social security checks, its not going to end the paychecks to the military, and its not going to stop the welfare checks. all the necesary functions are going to still be there regardless of what the fear mongers are screaming. What it is going to do is send 2/3s of the beurocrats home and let the actual necessity of people get the business of running the government done. Now over the last 6 years the house has sent the senate at least 10 budgets most of which allowed obamacare to be funded, the senate has deep sixed every bloody one of them for various reasons. Sequestration was Obama's comprimise, not the republicans, he just was dumb enough to think that the republicans would worry so much about funding the military that they would give him the social welfare blank check he wanted in a new budget back last year and not take the sequestration, WRONG. Dont bluff, especially when your not even holding cards. - Dartz - 09-22-2013 It seems like utter lunacy to me.... to continuously keep beating on the door of one single issue rather than actually bothering to run the country. Still. I'll be in DC at the end of next month. It might make for an interesting trip - or a dull one if all the museums are shut. Be fucking typical that. ________________________________ --m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig? - Werehawk - 09-22-2013 Obama's current political capital is pretty tenuous too say the least. Particularly after the entire Syria issue in which Vladimir Putin gave him a not too welcome way out of the debacle he'd gotten himself into. Nor does his doing a speech attacking Republicans at the very same time the Navy yard mass shooting was still unsettled help things... --Werehawk-- My mom's brief take on upcoming Guatemalan Elections "In last throes of preelection activities. Much loudspeaker vote pleading." - Morganite - 09-22-2013 Dartz Wrote:It seems like utter lunacy to me.... to continuously keep beating on the door of one single issue rather than actually bothering to run the country. It's a big issue. Leaving aside any directly healthcare-related concerns, a lot of people are worried about the various firings and hour-cuttings that are already happening in response to different provisions in the bill. (I find it more than slightly alarming that something which purports to improve health care is leading to so many people who work in the field losing their jobs. Not that it's just them being hit. I've never been so glad to work for a large company.) -Morgan. - ECSNorway - 09-22-2013 Quote:Morganni wrote:It's a pretty vital issue to me. I'd even call it life-threatening. Without insurance paying for my treatment -- and I've had one insurer try to call my condition "cosmetic" in the past -- I would spend what little would remain of my life in crippling pain, barely able to shuffle around like a 90-year-old, with every inch of my skin suffering the constant equivalent of borderline second-degree burns that NEVER HEAL. My health insurance is currently paying an utterly ridiculous amount of money to treat this condition (hint: it's about -double- my annual salary). Anything that threatens my access to health insurance willing to pay for that treatment, at a reasonable premium to me, is a direct attack on my LIFE.Quote:Dartz wrote: If Obamacare was a real solution, was actually going to provide worthwhile coverage... why is Congress exempt from it? Why are so many of the big labor unions, Obama's own biggest supporters, actively opposing it? -- Sucrose Octanitrate. Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode. - Dartz - 09-22-2013 All laws and programs have unintended consequences. Everything a government does (Or for that matter avoids doing) causes some form of unintended consequence. As much as a Program creates some unforeseen difficulty, the only effect of repealing that program entirely will be to revert to a known status quo that is known to be broken. Therefore that program should - rather than be annihilated entirely which will remove any positive effects the program has had - be amended to correct the flaws that have appeared. If a Program causes a problem, then perhaps amend the program to include tax-breaks for companies who hire more full-time employees, or make some of the costs of healthcare a partial tax-write-off or any number of things - or a dozen other options. (Why not make insurance costs a tax-writeoff for whoever pays it then? Since paying for it is mandatory...). Never mind that doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results is a mark of lunacy. What would happen in a functioning democracy is that somebody would propose an amendment like that - in some form or another - both sides would compromise to cover both their agendas as best as possible to find the solution that theoretically fits the will of the majority of people and the edifice rumbles along. ________________________________ --m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig? - ordnance11 - 09-22-2013 Quote:Morganni wrote:Morgan, I do not have the breakdown of the poll of those who do not want Obamacare, but a good portion of those who oppose it are liberals who do not think it goes far enough. And the I really would like to see a poll who reasons for their opposition. Medicare and Medicaid also had their opponents, but you don't see widespread opposition to them. __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - ordnance11 - 09-22-2013 Quote:Rajvik wrote:What is going to be still running are parts of the government that are essential to the security of the country. Period. From a website I googgled' here's the rundown: Quote:Inconvenienced CitizensIf you and yours in your community and state are not going to be impacted by this in some way, consider yourself lucky. What I didn't see in this list is FEMA. I don't know if the shutdown would affect their operations in Colorado. By the letter of the law, I would have to say yes. Here's the link http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/federalbu ... tdowns.htm __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - ordnance11 - 09-22-2013 Quote:werehawk wrote:Well, a second term president historically has less political capital to spend in the second term. Obama has even less given the fear and scorn the tail wagers in the GOP has for him. I mean look at the immigration and gun control legislation he tried to push through. On a personal note, from where I am, the people in the state I work in generally excoriate the federal government. Until they find out they need it's help and they demand full and instant service. Yesterday. Nevermind that service may be not forthcoming because our budget has been slashed. __________________ Into terror!, Into valour! Charge ahead! No! Never turn Yes, it's into the fire we fly And the devil will burn! - Scarlett Pimpernell - Bob Schroeck - 09-22-2013 Quote:Rajvik wrote:I don't know where you're getting your information, but around here at least the "liberal media" is going to extreme pains to reassure people that social security, the military, and other key programs won't be stopped. -- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - robkelk - 09-22-2013 ordnance11 Wrote:Morgan, I do not have the breakdown of the poll of those who do not want Obamacare, but a good portion of those who oppose it are liberals who do not think it goes far enough. And the I really would like to see a poll who reasons for their opposition. Medicare and Medicaid also had their opponents, but you don't see widespread opposition to them.Not any more, no, but look at how they were attacked when they were introduced. I understand the outcry was almost as big as was the outcry about government-paid medical care in Canada when that was introduced, or the UK's NHS when that was introduced, or... well, you get the picture. People don't like change, even if that change has statistical evidence that shows it'll keep them alive longer on average. (Get the stats from the various official government websites, and you'll see that average life expectancy in the US is lower than average life expectancy elsewhere in the industrialized world, until you get to the age bracket covered by Medicare and the average US life expectancy comes into line with everywhere else.) It's demonstrably good for them but it isn't what they've been doing all along, so it's resisted. -- Rob Kelk "Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of the same sovereign, servants of the same law." - Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012 - Black Aeronaut - 09-24-2013 Personally, I don't see why everyone is so dead-set against the Affordable Healthcare Act. Certainly, it's going to be expensive, especially where insurance companies seek to do as government contractors have done since time immemorian: squeeze the government for every last red cent. I can see why people would worry about that. Especially given how there was a lot of 'take the money and run' going on just a few years ago. What I can't understand is why the GOP is doing everything in their power to sabotage the AHA by making sure that Americans don't know what it is and how it works. Many things I've heard coming out of the mouths of Republicans (with few and rare exceptions) are either outright lies or carefully selected half-truths. I will side with others in saying that the AHA is flawed... but I am never going to side with those that demand its repeal. I say let us come to sensible terms over amendments to the law instead of taking two steps backwards just so we make plans to take one step forward. And let's not forget: The Federal Supreme Court itself, led by no less a person than the Honorable John G. Roberts Jr. - a card-carrying member of the GOP, has made things clear on the matter - they do not see anything really wrong with the AHA aside from some wording about penalties and taxes. Which they were kind enough to fix. - robkelk - 09-24-2013 Back to the "sequestration" thing... Have you folks ever considered adopting the parliamentary rules for budgets? Specifically, the one that says voting down a budget is legally equivalent to voting "no confidence" in the current government, thus dissolving the session and forcing an immediate general election? -- Rob Kelk "Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of the same sovereign, servants of the same law." - Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012 - Bob Schroeck - 09-24-2013 BA, part of it pure obstructionism -- there are vast swaths of the Republican Party who would rather sink the country than allow a Democratic president have any lasting positive legacy. Part of it is a genuine and sincere difference in belief about the role and scope of government in the lives of citizens (admittedly, cranked up to 11 and wandering slightly off the scale at points, but still...). And another part of it is tinfoil hat-level reactionaryism, fearing that once the US joins every other industrial nation in having national health care, the jackbooted thugs of the United Nations will come out of the holes they've been lurking in all these years to take away their guns and their Bibles, and impose Godless Communism(TM) and the NWO on the oppressed rich white men who are the only true backbone of America. Because a man is only free if he has a gun, a Bible, and a chance to go bankrupt if his medical bills get too large. No particular Republican in the House embodies all three of these, but from what I can tell, a large number embrace at least two... -- Bob --------- Then the horns kicked in... ...and my shoes began to squeak. - Logan Darklighter - 09-24-2013 Doesn't anyone here remember that the sequestration was Obama's idea originally? No? I'm not surprised. The democrats and the media have done everything they can to obfuscate that fact by simply not reporting it. - Foxboy - 09-24-2013 Sequestration was a bluff of the "They can't POSSIBLY be that stupid as to let it happen!" variety. Sadly, like many, Obama found that they COULD be that stupid. ''We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.'' -- James Nicoll - ECSNorway - 09-24-2013 Factoid of the day: It is the (Democrat-controlled) Senate, not the (Republican-controlled) House of Representatives or the (Democrat-controlled) White House that has voted down every single budget bill submitted since Obama took office. If you want to blame someone for the Sequester, now you have your culprit. -- Sucrose Octanitrate. Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode. |