Posts: 2,564
Threads: 324
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
Oh, definitely copyright infringement. I wonder how ole'Rush is going to explain this one?
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell
He'll probably claim it's fair use--that's what political propagandists generally do when copying other people's work. During the last presidential campaign there was a very widely distributed poster for the Obamessiah Hopenchange that led to the AP suing the guy who created the poster for copying an AP photo. He claimed fair use, and ended up settling out of court.
Posts: 2,072
Threads: 62
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
0
... The possibility that the guy whose name is on the image is responsible never occurred to you?
-Morgan.
Posts: 2,272
Threads: 117
Joined: Aug 2003
Reputation:
1
Given that the article includes a quote from the artist commenting on his work being copied? No.
Posts: 2,072
Threads: 62
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
0
I was referring to Hiers, not Reynolds.
It depends on whether he did it as a work for hire or not--if he did, it's on the newletter's publisher. If not, it's on Hiers alone.
Posts: 8,933
Threads: 386
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
At the very least I'd say he deserves to be lampooned by the entire gaming community.
Posts: 27,717
Threads: 2,281
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
21
In my defense, I want to say that I meant it in the sense of "Rush Limbaugh, Inc.'s media machine rips of D&D", not "Rush Limbaugh personally traced that picture and then pasted his head on it before claiming it entirely as his own work."
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.