Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RIAA Versus Radio Boradcasters
RIAA Versus Radio Boradcasters
#1
It appears that the RIAA doesn't want people playing songs on the radio anymore.

At least not without a cut.

---------------

Epsilon
Reply
 
#2
I'm flabbergasted at the towering mountain of stupidity that is the RIAA.

Talk about biting the hand that feeds you! If they actually GET what they're asking for, the LACK of their music on radio is going to be the final nail in
their coffin.

At least all those unsigned and local bands will have somewhere to go to get their music played, because radio will be BEGGING for something to play that is
NOT "approved" by these music mafia morons.

Hmm... It might actually make radio worth listening to again!

Go for it, RIAA! PLEASE win this one!

Point that gun RIGHT AT YOUR OWN HEAD AND PULL THE FUCKING TRIGGER!!!!!
Reply
 
#3
Quote:Hmm... It might actually make radio worth listening to again!
It might, if we're lucky.

Then again, there's an awful lot of awful music out there released under a Creative Commons licence...

--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Reply
 
#4
I'm deeply bemused by one of the articles linked to from that page.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/0 ... eviouspost

The MPAA has pretty much jumped the legal shark with this one. "We shouldn't have to prove that people are breaking the law. It's too hard."

Uhm... ok. Then I shouldn't have to prove that (insert politician here) is a dumbass and should be thrown out of office. [Image: smile.gif]
--
Sucrose Octanitrate.
Proof positive that with sufficient motivation, you can make anything explode.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)