Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe)
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe)
#31
You do realize that if these 'angels' have 'fought' their way through thee UN they are going to be rather gooey by the time the pilots get to them. Anyway...
Quote:
Sachiel - Despite the cute little bird-skulls she wears in her hair, she's probably better compared to an overly-affectionate octopus, ie, her action figure comes with Power Glomp Action. Can be... explosively vocal at times.
Your kind of ignoring the whole head wound inducing, laser arm things... I mean Sachiel basically does something to Shinji's Eva that's first syllable is skull. The energy blast I can see as a combat thing... but ignoring the basic weapons for the suicide attack? Cutting off the retractable, phallic, penetration weapons for a reason?
Quote:
Ramiel - Resident loli. Not someone you want to get on the bad side of.
First, loli? The pilots are 14 unless aged, the primary combatants are all loli. Plus, how do you figure the laser drill wielding turtle is a loli? The hard to break defenses and dangerous one shot kill attacks? Relentlessly determined to hold her ground? More like turtle themed assault ninja.
If your going loli pick the smaller than the rest, computer virus angel, Iruel. The little, twisted hacker/pheromone spawn point motif makes more sense. That and a mushroom hat thing on her head.
Sahaquiel should like fireworks and explosives. Far, far too much. Likes throwing things... grenades are her favorite toy. Likes to talk with Kensuke about the wonders of making things explode.
Armisael... Mercurial personality, can't tell her reaction from one minute to the next, with any luck... physically thin, her hair and clothes keep changing style/length/color without warning... likes frequently changed 'toys' that don't involve leaving marks (which means that Shamshel scares her, till out of sight then, she ignores that issue or forgets it entirely, understanding the way her mind works is not worth then effort as she'll change that at some point in the future)... when she is in the mood (often without any warning) she'll just jump the closest entity available... Not into taking her time as she looses intrest frequently and randomly... if she gets the remote your watching random programs in random order for random lengths of time... All in all confusing and unfocused.
Oh and Florin, the pope won't bless nukes... after all devices that summon Plutonius aren't artifacts of another religion.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-03-2006, 11:01 PM
Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-03-2006, 11:12 PM
Re: Shito-XXX - by Angryoptimist - 04-04-2006, 12:11 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by HoagieOfDoom - 04-04-2006, 01:16 AM
Alternate idea for the confrontations - by Necratoid - 04-04-2006, 01:56 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-04-2006, 04:06 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by HoagieOfDoom - 04-04-2006, 04:18 AM
Re: re:Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-04-2006, 07:31 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 08:26 AM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Deadpan29 - 04-04-2006, 03:36 PM
!!! Again - by Foxboy - 04-04-2006, 04:18 PM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Necratoid - 04-04-2006, 05:01 PM
...then sod the MPAA - by Rod.H - 04-04-2006, 05:07 PM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by WengFook - 04-04-2006, 05:40 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by jpub - 04-04-2006, 06:51 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 09:19 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 10:57 PM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Necratoid - 04-05-2006, 12:44 AM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Rieverre - 04-05-2006, 01:01 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Bob Schroeck - 04-05-2006, 02:31 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Bob Schroeck - 04-05-2006, 02:32 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-05-2006, 03:46 AM
*sweatdrops* - by Rieverre - 04-05-2006, 03:56 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by WengFook - 04-05-2006, 06:01 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by jpub - 04-05-2006, 07:13 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Xenoproctologist - 04-05-2006, 07:43 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by jpub - 04-05-2006, 07:50 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by ClassicDrogn - 04-05-2006, 08:15 AM
ugh, I disgust myself - by Foxboy - 04-05-2006, 04:11 PM
Why am I doing this? - by Shirei - 04-05-2006, 04:21 PM
Re: ugh, I disgust myself - by ClassicDrogn - 04-05-2006, 04:41 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-06-2006, 03:59 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-06-2006, 03:21 PM
thoughtful - by Foxboy - 04-06-2006, 03:56 PM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-06-2006, 06:46 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-06-2006, 08:07 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-06-2006, 08:26 PM
thoughful - by Necratoid - 04-06-2006, 09:22 PM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-06-2006, 09:44 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-07-2006, 01:18 AM
Re: thoughtful - by Bob Schroeck - 04-07-2006, 01:32 AM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 01:51 AM
Re: thoughtful - by Kokuten - 04-07-2006, 03:12 AM
Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:16 AM
Re: Art! - by Valles - 04-07-2006, 10:22 AM
Re: Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:38 AM
Re: Art! - by Valles - 04-07-2006, 10:43 AM
Re: Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:58 AM
Re: Art! - by Kokuten - 04-07-2006, 03:19 PM
re: tan Rei - by Foxboy - 04-07-2006, 03:29 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by ECSNorway - 04-07-2006, 04:30 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by Necratoid - 04-07-2006, 05:08 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 07:28 PM
Rei, the fashion statement, - by Necratoid - 04-07-2006, 09:50 PM
Re: Rei, the fashion statement, - by ClassicDrogn - 04-08-2006, 01:56 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by sweno - 04-08-2006, 10:33 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by sweno - 04-09-2006, 01:58 AM
Re: Site - by DKnight54 - 04-18-2006, 07:35 PM
Re: Site - by Star Ranger4 - 04-18-2006, 08:05 PM
Re: Site - by Bob Schroeck - 04-19-2006, 03:15 AM
Re: Site - by Deadpan29 - 06-09-2006, 06:58 PM
Re: Site - by jpub - 06-09-2006, 07:17 PM
Re: Site - by ClassicDrogn - 06-10-2006, 06:04 AM
Grey Archive - by Guest - 06-10-2006, 08:24 AM
Re: Grey Archive - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 06-15-2006, 01:22 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)