Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe)
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe)
#63
Quote:
Armisael - 'Angel of the Womb' suggests a couple of potential fetishes, but any attempt by my brain to either work around the idea or apply it tends to end up going 'squick', so I'm open to suggestions.
Now that I've got permission-
'Angel of the Womb' brings up a couple fetishes immediately
-uterine penetration. No-shit there, physically speaking, it is real-world plausible. Not my cup of tea, I haven't researched enough to find more than a rare anecdotal reference, and countless absurdly bad ASSTR.org pieces.
-pregnancy fetish. This is a double-edged sword. She(?) could either be hot on the idea of getting pregnant, or hot on the idea of getting _others_ pregnant, or both.. Picture a divine being with a fetish for breeding - contraceptive methodology would start failing en masse..
-pregnancy fetish B-side. Gender swap it.. this Angel is male, and he's got a need.. a need to breed. Human Instrumentality? Nope, he breeds straight human (or not), he just wants to 'sow his oats'.

-'extreme' penetration. The human vagina, and by extension the divine, is an incredibly flexible and elastic structure. While not exactly 'common', it is entirely possible for the vagina to accomodate one or more fists or objects of equivalent size. This also has a possible sub-branch of
-size play. given that there is the discrepancy between the full size and the 'Micronized' Angels, what's to stop her from pushing Shinji up to, say, 18 or 20.. inches. and 7 or 8 in diameter. This would be tricky to write - the downfall of much size-based porn is being inexact or flat-out unbelievable about the sizes, or even worse, inconsistant. Also, choosing the plausible relative sizes on this would be difficult.
Quote:
Unnecessary ecchiness department: you notice those Core jewels on the figurines? Those, I'm thinking, are just decoration.
The Angels' actual Cores are indeed red and glowing, but they're a lot smaller in proportion and somewhat more concealed. And attacking them is indeed a key to victory. ^.^
Core Jewels as Clitoris is a WONDERFUL idea - given that some of the multitude of vaginal configurations hides the clitoris until a high pitch of arousal is achieved.. be one hell of a shock to notice a red glowing dot at the apex of your union, if you were shagging one of these.. I am intrigued!
Quote:
rent Titanic just to fast forward to the nudity and pause it.
Been there, done that. From a romance and historical accuracy perspective, I find the scene hard to swallow. From a pornography perspective, I find it absurdly disappointing.
Quote:
Read a few of the old harem threads on Anime Adventures for examples of harem thread deaths.

In all seriousness, too large of a cast of characters will kill this idea. Even the 'NGE Hentai' episode had a vastly reduced cast. Big Faces, not big numbers.. perhaps give each of the Angels a 2 or 3 episode 'lifespan'?
"Sorry folks, it's been fun, and I'm carrying your baby, Kaji.. or maybe yours, Gendou.. or yours, Ritsuko (Shinji: I knew she was bent), or yours, Shinji.. but I gotta go home now, Daddy's calling"
Quote:
I never said this forum would be entirely child-safe, I suppose, although it does make me vaguely uncomfortable for reasons I am unable to put my finger on.
Maybe because you just gave permission to someone who could be a repressed Happosai type to let lose the 'inner demon' on your board?
; )
Quote:
And as for Shinji: while you might think his self-esteem would be going through the roof, I suspect that the sheer weirdness of the situation will be putting a lot of pressure on him. As does the insistence that "in the end there can be only one" (now you die, Highlander!), which makes his situation more complicated with each battle, which could very well cause him to run away once or twice... (Of course, the girls will be hunting him down.)
From the Shinji perspective, he's gonna be too wrapped up in the psycho-sexual meltdown to just.. let his testicles do the thinking. He's probably going to be guilt-ridden at his 'improper' behavior, and quite possibly suicidal, depending on how dark the Author wants to go.
Aaaaaand, appropriately enough, I'm spent. [Image: kokbanner.jpg]
--- Kokuten Daysleeper, Retired Epicced Officered DorfWire Geek - Burning the weak and trampling the dead since 1979
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-03-2006, 11:01 PM
Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-03-2006, 11:12 PM
Re: Shito-XXX - by Angryoptimist - 04-04-2006, 12:11 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by HoagieOfDoom - 04-04-2006, 01:16 AM
Alternate idea for the confrontations - by Necratoid - 04-04-2006, 01:56 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-04-2006, 04:06 AM
Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by HoagieOfDoom - 04-04-2006, 04:18 AM
Re: re:Re: Re: Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-04-2006, 07:31 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 08:26 AM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Deadpan29 - 04-04-2006, 03:36 PM
!!! Again - by Foxboy - 04-04-2006, 04:18 PM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Necratoid - 04-04-2006, 05:01 PM
...then sod the MPAA - by Rod.H - 04-04-2006, 05:07 PM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by WengFook - 04-04-2006, 05:40 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by jpub - 04-04-2006, 06:51 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 09:19 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by blob - 04-04-2006, 10:57 PM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Necratoid - 04-05-2006, 12:44 AM
Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Rieverre - 04-05-2006, 01:01 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Bob Schroeck - 04-05-2006, 02:31 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Bob Schroeck - 04-05-2006, 02:32 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-05-2006, 03:46 AM
*sweatdrops* - by Rieverre - 04-05-2006, 03:56 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by WengFook - 04-05-2006, 06:01 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by jpub - 04-05-2006, 07:13 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by Xenoproctologist - 04-05-2006, 07:43 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by jpub - 04-05-2006, 07:50 AM
Re: ...then sod the MPAA - by ClassicDrogn - 04-05-2006, 08:15 AM
ugh, I disgust myself - by Foxboy - 04-05-2006, 04:11 PM
Why am I doing this? - by Shirei - 04-05-2006, 04:21 PM
Re: ugh, I disgust myself - by ClassicDrogn - 04-05-2006, 04:41 PM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-06-2006, 03:59 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by Kokuten - 04-06-2006, 03:21 PM
thoughtful - by Foxboy - 04-06-2006, 03:56 PM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-06-2006, 06:46 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-06-2006, 08:07 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-06-2006, 08:26 PM
thoughful - by Necratoid - 04-06-2006, 09:22 PM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-06-2006, 09:44 PM
Re: thoughtful - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 04-07-2006, 01:18 AM
Re: thoughtful - by Bob Schroeck - 04-07-2006, 01:32 AM
Re: thoughtful - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 01:51 AM
Re: thoughtful - by Kokuten - 04-07-2006, 03:12 AM
Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:16 AM
Re: Art! - by Valles - 04-07-2006, 10:22 AM
Re: Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:38 AM
Re: Art! - by Valles - 04-07-2006, 10:43 AM
Re: Art! - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 10:58 AM
Re: Art! - by Kokuten - 04-07-2006, 03:19 PM
re: tan Rei - by Foxboy - 04-07-2006, 03:29 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by ECSNorway - 04-07-2006, 04:30 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by Necratoid - 04-07-2006, 05:08 PM
Re: re: tan Rei - by ClassicDrogn - 04-07-2006, 07:28 PM
Rei, the fashion statement, - by Necratoid - 04-07-2006, 09:50 PM
Re: Rei, the fashion statement, - by ClassicDrogn - 04-08-2006, 01:56 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by sweno - 04-08-2006, 10:33 AM
Re: Shito-XXX (will never be worksafe) - by sweno - 04-09-2006, 01:58 AM
Re: Site - by DKnight54 - 04-18-2006, 07:35 PM
Re: Site - by Star Ranger4 - 04-18-2006, 08:05 PM
Re: Site - by Bob Schroeck - 04-19-2006, 03:15 AM
Re: Site - by Deadpan29 - 06-09-2006, 06:58 PM
Re: Site - by jpub - 06-09-2006, 07:17 PM
Re: Site - by ClassicDrogn - 06-10-2006, 06:04 AM
Grey Archive - by Guest - 06-10-2006, 08:24 AM
Re: Grey Archive - by Evil Midnight Lurker - 06-15-2006, 01:22 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)