Quote:Thank you for welcoming me. I might just stick around. If nothing else this place has more lively discussion than the anifics board. ;p
Thanks for taking the time to do so, Epsilon, and welcome to the forums. I hope you'll have the time to hang out on a more or less regular basis once this thread expires on its own, but even if you don't we're grateful you've joined in on this one topic at least.
Quote:Thanks a lot. Feedback, positive and negative, is always appreciated.
Let me say that I've been greatly enjoying Hybrid Theory (even as I grow more and more aghast at what is actually happening therein), and I'm looking forward to whatever blockbuster of a conclusion you guys have in mind. The explication of your intentions with the arcs is of particular interest to me, as it validates the gut feelings I developed while reading. I suppose you can count that as at least a limited success.
Quote:*embarassed grin* I've never actually read Drunkard's Walk. Mainly this was because I wasn't aware of it. I mean, I devoured just about everything else out there, even Skysaber's stuff. For some reason, it just slipped below my radar. I tell you what, I'll give it a read soon and post a review on these boards. Though likely in a more appropriate sub-forum.
In regards to your goals with arc 1, I'd be curious to find out if you've read the extant Drunkard's Walk material, and what opinion either or both of you had of my own attempts to subvert/twist the "insert phenomenon".
Oh, and to ClassicDrogn, hello again. At least if you're the ClassicDrogn from the gMCA project that never got off the ground. Heh. He's one of the few people who knows any details about the aborted project I was working on before Hybrid Theory that contains many of the same concepts. ;p
---------------
Epsilon