Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter
#5
I have always thought of magic as an interference to tech, much like holding a magnet up to a tv will distort the picture (and if left there permanently do so). Having magic output small (even very, very, small) emp's is vast overkill. As it would kill all electronics in a noticeable area. And that just doesn't mesh with cannon.
And yes (to cut off the nits before they can be picked) if you scale down an emp enough it simply becomes interference. What makes it an emp is the (very) large amount of potential difference over a (very) short distance. Likewise if you squeeze other types of interference down to a short enough time span and jack the power up, it approaches the effect of an emp.-Terry
------
"in comes a man in cameo with a american flag, because american flags float around in the wilderness." - Mike Keon
Please Remember: People are stupid... Programers are people.
-Terry
-----
"so listen up boy, or pornography starring your mother will be the second worst thing to happen to you today"
TF2: Spy
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by sweno - 01-04-2006, 11:03 AM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Necratoid - 01-04-2006, 01:12 PM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Kokuten - 01-04-2006, 10:29 PM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Necratoid - 01-05-2006, 12:43 AM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Necratoid - 01-06-2006, 08:49 PM
Engineer? More like target practice. - by Foxboy - 01-25-2006, 11:28 AM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Necratoid - 02-17-2006, 03:05 PM
Re: The nature of Technomancy in Harry Potter - by Necratoid - 02-17-2006, 10:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)