The Inquirer: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/ ... eory-falls]RIAA's 'making available' theory falls
At least in New Haven, "making available" is not sufficient proof that copyright infringement actually happened; "distribution requires an 'actual dissemination' of a copy".
(Slowly but surely, the courts are actually requiring the RIAA to follow the law of the land...)
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
At least in New Haven, "making available" is not sufficient proof that copyright infringement actually happened; "distribution requires an 'actual dissemination' of a copy".
(Slowly but surely, the courts are actually requiring the RIAA to follow the law of the land...)
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012