(Wire: with rusty sporks!)
I doubt there's any idea in anyone's mind that online contracts themselves are in danger from this. As presented in the linked article, it seems
pretty clear to me the judge's complaint is with the specific clauses of this contract, and possibly by extension other contracts containing fundamentally
similar clauses, but not the idea of online contracts overall. Regardless of what the title of the article might imply.
If the headline were the only thing to go by, I could see that interpretation. But as-is, it seems ... unlikely.
--sofaspud
--"Listening to your kid is the audio equivalent of a Salvador Dali painting, Spud." --OpMegs
I doubt there's any idea in anyone's mind that online contracts themselves are in danger from this. As presented in the linked article, it seems
pretty clear to me the judge's complaint is with the specific clauses of this contract, and possibly by extension other contracts containing fundamentally
similar clauses, but not the idea of online contracts overall. Regardless of what the title of the article might imply.
If the headline were the only thing to go by, I could see that interpretation. But as-is, it seems ... unlikely.
--sofaspud
--"Listening to your kid is the audio equivalent of a Salvador Dali painting, Spud." --OpMegs