Here's http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/23 ... r_lawsuit/]a different article on the subject, with a link to a PDF of the decision. The central point seems to be any one-sided TOS/EULA/etc. which claims that it can be changed arbitrarily and with no warning is not binding because there's no way for the other side of the "contract" to know just what the "agreement" means at any given moment, or any way to trust that the "agreement" is going to stay the same for any measureable length of time.
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.