Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Microsoft vs. Open Office: Getting to the Bottom of It, Once and For All
 
#2
It might just be OpenOffice being confused by changes in control codes and the like between whatever version of the .rtf specification it uses, and whatever version MsOffice uses. You got to remember that .rtf isl a Microsoft specification.

In anyways, I'm not worried. I use .odt format, since OO and MsOffice are usually able to read it. Just about anything can read it these days, and usually handle it better than a .doc. That, and I like how Openoffice handles equations added to documents... that was great in college. And I could just dump the document out as a .pdf when done, so I didn't need to worry about compatibility.
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[No subject] - by Dartz - 10-24-2010, 07:07 PM
[No subject] - by ECSNorway - 10-24-2010, 08:42 PM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 10-25-2010, 12:48 AM
[No subject] - by paladindythe - 10-25-2010, 04:56 AM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 10-25-2010, 06:13 AM
[No subject] - by Sofaspud - 10-25-2010, 08:53 AM
[No subject] - by Jorlem - 10-25-2010, 11:53 AM
[No subject] - by paladindythe - 10-25-2010, 01:20 PM
[No subject] - by jpub - 10-25-2010, 04:04 PM
[No subject] - by Jorlem - 10-25-2010, 05:26 PM
RTF all the way - by Stephen Mann - 10-25-2010, 05:27 PM
[No subject] - by Wiregeek - 10-25-2010, 05:38 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 10-26-2010, 12:09 AM
[No subject] - by jpub - 10-26-2010, 01:44 AM
[No subject] - by Valles - 10-26-2010, 03:11 AM
[No subject] - by Sofaspud - 10-26-2010, 03:45 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 10-26-2010, 05:15 AM
[No subject] - by Sofaspud - 10-26-2010, 07:22 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 10-26-2010, 12:49 PM
[No subject] - by Bob Schroeck - 10-26-2010, 01:02 PM
[No subject] - by jpub - 10-26-2010, 03:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)