The problem with Lawful Evil is that it's not just easier... it's almost necessary these days. Applying 'common sense' might work 99/100... but that 1/100 time it doesn't, who's going to get the blame but the person who elected to use their own common sense. Most of these ignorant 'Lawful Evil' proceedures came about because someone managed to injure themselves, and organisations are protecting themselves from any form of liability in the event that an accident does actually happen. A court settlement can send a business to the wall, or put a bankrupt a person.... and nobody wants to risk that. It's a side-effect of a culture where everything happens to me must be someone elses fault... and they should pay. So people are now going out of their way to do everything to show before hand that they did everything they could to stop other people from having an accident... because if they don't, a judge might just side with the claimant.
(And in Western systems, there's a tendancy to award costs to the case winner also... which can end up being far more than the eventual settlement)
There's a reason a quote car insurance was several times the value of my car (And actually higher than the fine for not having it.)
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?
(And in Western systems, there's a tendancy to award costs to the case winner also... which can end up being far more than the eventual settlement)
There's a reason a quote car insurance was several times the value of my car (And actually higher than the fine for not having it.)
________________________________
--m(^0^)m-- Wot, no sig?