Quote:paladindythe wrote:I remember they had spares in case the ones in Mars went goofy and they have to figure out a fix on earth. Whether those were scrapped or not is the question. Money at this point and time should not be a problem.
Quote:ordnance11 wrote:Since NASA has a rather limited budget these years, I imagine not. But I could be wrong. A lot of these ideas boil down to "neat but not worth the cost for a contingency plan".
Does NASA have any spare Mars rovers? Those things would be engineered against radiation. Outfit one with an X-Ray/Gamma Ray imager and had it go autonomously inside would do the trick. But that also takes time.
It's been said (I forget by who) that our current risk management techniques work well until you get to "extremely rare but catastrophic" events. A seperate (financial) example would be the morgage backed security collapse in 2008. We (as a civilization) haven't figured out how much is enough in these situations.
__________________
Into terror!, Into valour!
Charge ahead! No! Never turn
Yes, it's into the fire we fly
And the devil will burn!
- Scarlett Pimpernell