4th of July Challenge

[hazard]

robkelk wrote:

---

Did we read the same story? That isn't what the one I linked to was saying.

Ehm, yes it does. Or it can atleast be very easily interpreted as such.
Quite frankly, if you made voting as onerous for men as it was for the women in that story they wouldn't want to vote either. As I noted on post 13 in this thread the problem isn't enfranchising the population.
The problem is getting them invested in voting.
That means that you don't require them to vote for every little thing, as well as creating a culture that in some way glorifies casting your vote and let the populace feel that voting actualy has an impact on politics. Getting them invested in the promises the candidates and parties make and forcing those same candidates and parties to actually follow through on them (or explain why they won't) could be part of this.