LulzKiller Wrote:You're right - somebody could no doubt apply GPL or LGPL to a work of fiction.robkelk Wrote:...
Do we have a page under Writer's Tools for licenses?
Do we want a page under Writer's Tools - or anywhere else on ATT - for licenses?
Over on the freebie wiki, I just chased a free-use license down a rabbit-hole... and came up with two of them instead of the expected one. So, here's the start of a list of licenses, in MediaWiki markup:
* GNU doesn't have an "art" license, instead sending people to FSF
* FSF doesn't have an "art" license, instead sending people to artlibre.org
* [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ artlibre.org Free Art License 1.3]
* [http://opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license/ Open Source Initiative Artistic license] - two versions
And there's always Creative Commons. Anybody got a link for them?
This (hypothetical?) page should also mention "putting your work into the public domain" - which is not the same as offering a license for it....
I guess it could count under the GNU Free Documentation License
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_ ... on_License
It's naturally designed for non-fiction works but I don't see why it couldn't be applied to literature.
(The trip down the rabbit-hole was because a 3D model mentioned the "GNU Fan Art" license - which isn't listed on the GNU license page. I should ask whether the artist intended to use GPL or LGPL...)
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012