Reminding myself (and Bob) here to go vote on that Request for Stewardship. As of this posting, it needs at least 10 more people to comment on it. EDIT: Went and voted; the proposal now needs eight more people to weigh in.
And I spotted a possible loophole in the current draft of the CoC: Who gets to decide what is offensive? Anyone have any suggestions on how to phrase a "community standards" definition that will let each hosted wiki (not wiki founder) set their own definition?
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
And I spotted a possible loophole in the current draft of the CoC: Who gets to decide what is offensive? Anyone have any suggestions on how to phrase a "community standards" definition that will let each hosted wiki (not wiki founder) set their own definition?
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."
- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012