Perhaps Trump doesn't know that editorials are traditionally unsigned

[Rajvik]

I'm still seeing a lot of messenger-shooting going on over this. I'm still not seeing any rebuttals of the content of the piece.

From what I've heard, John Kelly has said Woodward's book, (which supposedly takes the same line,) is full of lies and half truths which is part of the reason why I suggested that the NYT and Woodward were trying to bullshit this into something. Add to that the Media Resource Center saying that the Times has a "history of over-inflating" their sources and "not fact checking deep enough". Then we can add on top of that the Kavenaugh confirmation hearings started the same day this came out, distraction much? I'm sorry but it smells a bit to much like Comey's speech 2 point oh.