RE: In a sane world, this would have been enough to disqualify him on the spot
09-29-2018, 10:41 AM
09-29-2018, 10:41 AM
That's what they want.
Because now they can use the same excuse to attack any alternative judge. You say this guy might be biased, why won't your guy be biased against us? We know we're lying, so how can we be sure you're telling the truth?
We know we've got a big lie on our side, so obviously anything *they* say about us is just another lie to discredit us. Eventually, everybody is untrustworthy. Everybody lies. Even if they don't. Because, ultimately, it's now the new normal.
Why wouldn't they?
The only thing left is whether your side, or their side wins. Because...... that's just the way things are now.
Because now they can use the same excuse to attack any alternative judge. You say this guy might be biased, why won't your guy be biased against us? We know we're lying, so how can we be sure you're telling the truth?
We know we've got a big lie on our side, so obviously anything *they* say about us is just another lie to discredit us. Eventually, everybody is untrustworthy. Everybody lies. Even if they don't. Because, ultimately, it's now the new normal.
Why wouldn't they?
The only thing left is whether your side, or their side wins. Because...... that's just the way things are now.
I love the smell of rotaries in the morning. You know one time, I got to work early, before the rush hour. I walked through the empty carpark, I didn't see one bloody Prius or Golf. And that smell, you know that gasoline smell, the whole carpark, smelled like.... ....speed.
One day they're going to ban them.