(04-25-2019, 07:00 AM)Rajvik Wrote: My argument is not whether or not any one point is true or false, it is that the whole damn cockamamie argument is actually a bullshit attempt at overt control through guilt and threat, ie extortion.
"I don't care if something is true, I only care whether it can be used to advance an agenda I don't like." Well, again, refreshing honestly that.
I mean, yes, there is an attempt at overt control thanks to climate change. Nobody is hiding this. We need to control emissions, that kind of requires control. It's right there. You say this like there is some secret sinister conspiracy to sneak control of emissions into the agenda to... control emissions.
I mean, seriously, if someone told you not to jump off a bridge would you do it just to spite them while shouting "You don't own meeeeeeee...."