RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XVII
09-10-2020, 08:22 PM (This post was last modified: 09-10-2020, 08:33 PM by GethN7.)
09-10-2020, 08:22 PM (This post was last modified: 09-10-2020, 08:33 PM by GethN7.)
I've taken an extraordinary step here, but I consider it legally the only sane thing we can do.
This page is protected against creation because there is no way in HELL we can legally talk about it
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Cuties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuties
From what I've read of descriptions of the content, this is child pornography by any definition, and I have zero desire to court legal trouble. I am extremely loath to do something like this, but given the descriptions of it's content describe all sorts of child sexualization and even includes child nudity, and I have no desire whatsoever for us to be associated with this.
You can defend Nabokov's Lolita. Lolicon and shotacon are not illegal at least in the US albeit morally vile, but purposeful live-action sexualization of children to the extent this does crosses a line I do NOT want to consider touching.
Note: TV Tropes does have a page on it, but it comes with a warning to NOT use the US cover, is sanitized to the point of being a stub, and still describes child sexualization as a plot element. I don't care to risk even that.
This page is protected against creation because there is no way in HELL we can legally talk about it
https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Cuties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuties
From what I've read of descriptions of the content, this is child pornography by any definition, and I have zero desire to court legal trouble. I am extremely loath to do something like this, but given the descriptions of it's content describe all sorts of child sexualization and even includes child nudity, and I have no desire whatsoever for us to be associated with this.
You can defend Nabokov's Lolita. Lolicon and shotacon are not illegal at least in the US albeit morally vile, but purposeful live-action sexualization of children to the extent this does crosses a line I do NOT want to consider touching.
Note: TV Tropes does have a page on it, but it comes with a warning to NOT use the US cover, is sanitized to the point of being a stub, and still describes child sexualization as a plot element. I don't care to risk even that.