Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XVII
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XVII
(09-11-2020, 11:19 AM)robkelk Wrote:
(09-11-2020, 08:00 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: However, if you're going to unilaterally insist that a work is so eeeeevul that it cannot even be acknowledged by the wiki, let alone discussed, well...  I think I have Fast Eddie's hat around here somewhere for you.

Aaaaaand I think it's time for everybody to take a step back from this discussion. It's getting personal.


So... (searches for a topic change) ...Anybody want to help put licenses on old images? I now have a complete set of lists of which images need them.

I'm not offended, Rob, this does look like Fast Eddie style decision on the surface, Bob is right.

Thing is, I wouldn't dare want to be accused of doing anything he did unless I was quite sure I'd be able to justify it legally, and in this case, I believe my decision is firmly on the side of NOT performing necromancy on Jeffrey Epstein. If I turn out to be absolutely wrong, so be it, but one thing we agreed to since day one is we would not host content that would be considered inherently illegal, and I'm firmly convinced, regardless what Netflix thinks, this hits that threshold.

I've provided evidence of my claims for independent review and the movie itself is now available in most countries save Turkey (who have outright banned it), so anyone who wants to give it look see and take the legal risk to prove me right or wrong has what they need to do so.


EDIT:

I'd be fine with us have a locked stub giving basic information about it's existence at best, that's not unreasonable, but I'd still have to give a hard no to troping child porn.


Messages In This Thread
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XVII - by GethN7 - 09-11-2020, 11:41 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)