(11-07-2020, 11:57 AM)robkelk Wrote:(11-07-2020, 11:48 AM)GethN7 Wrote:(11-07-2020, 11:09 AM)robkelk Wrote:(11-06-2020, 10:41 PM)GethN7 Wrote: Seems like there is some flesh to hang on the "votes were rigged" skeleton:
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/...newsletter
Not saying this particular story is or is not factual, but Just The News has a history of running counterfactual stories, according to Media Bias Fact Check. (Even The Register comes out better than that.)
Can you find the same story on a reliable news source (either Very High or High on the Very High/High/Mostly Factual/Mixed/Low/Very Low scale that Media Bias Fact Check uses), Geth?
https://montanadailygazette.com/2020/11/...-of-votes/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...r-BB1aM1Be
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/20...-for-biden
https://www.newsbreak.com/news/209766864...y-to-trump
Most of these sources are left-leaning or of unknown affiliation. They share the same basic facts as the first source I used. MSN.com is rated High.
(goes and reads the MSN story)
A software glitch is a bad thing, but I'd hardly call it "fraud". It counts as poor judgment on the part of the election officials if the software was known to glitch.
I'll accept that for now, one swallow doesn't make a spring. If similar "errors" crop up elsewhere, then that might change, but for now, this could be an honest mistake.