Ooh, that's a good one, Hazard! Rob and Batz too, but that really goes the extra ... kilometer, I suppose, for a weapon system sourced anywhere-not-USA 
For the militarization of the original civilian versions, I'm now imagining something like the Ukraine situation where defenders forted up in a steel mill after slowly falling back through the rest of a heavy industrial district and collected all the EZLS they could along the way, welding on gasoline or diesel generators as a backpack to maintain operational time with grid power cut off, and a few pieces of sheet steel to armor critical locations, at least against small arms fire. Being basically as mobile as a human but much stronger then allowed for a single operator to use a normally crew served weapon as noted, but also to quickly set up barricades for defensive and ambush points, and to quickly move important supply stockpiles as the lines continued to shift. After all, soldiers and guns are what win a battle, but running out of food and bullets to supply them is what loses a seige.
For the militarization of the original civilian versions, I'm now imagining something like the Ukraine situation where defenders forted up in a steel mill after slowly falling back through the rest of a heavy industrial district and collected all the EZLS they could along the way, welding on gasoline or diesel generators as a backpack to maintain operational time with grid power cut off, and a few pieces of sheet steel to armor critical locations, at least against small arms fire. Being basically as mobile as a human but much stronger then allowed for a single operator to use a normally crew served weapon as noted, but also to quickly set up barricades for defensive and ambush points, and to quickly move important supply stockpiles as the lines continued to shift. After all, soldiers and guns are what win a battle, but running out of food and bullets to supply them is what loses a seige.
--
‎noli esse culus
‎noli esse culus