Drunkard's Walk Forums › General › Politics and Other Fun v
"Roe v Wade"

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
"Roe v Wade"
hazard Offline
Established Member
***
Posts: 1,965
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 0
RE: "Roe v Wade"
#18
08-11-2022, 08:49 AM
This is unusual how?

Police forcing technology companies to cough up the records of conversations has been a thing for a long time indeed.


Yes, it's new that this happened in an abortion prosecution case, but that's because for some 50 years abortion law was vaguely sensible in the US. Very vaguely.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 05-04-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Pyeknu - 05-04-2022, 04:39 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Norgarth - 05-04-2022, 05:35 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Jinx999 - 06-24-2022, 11:52 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-24-2022, 12:01 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-24-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-25-2022, 12:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-30-2022, 01:37 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-25-2022, 09:59 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 05:08 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 06-26-2022, 08:22 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-26-2022, 09:18 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-26-2022, 04:04 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 06-26-2022, 11:54 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 07-14-2022, 05:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 08:49 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 10:42 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-11-2022, 05:06 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 05:43 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-17-2022, 06:45 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 08-17-2022, 09:32 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-18-2022, 03:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)