Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Roe v Wade"
RE: "Roe v Wade"
#21
Actually, the police aren't taking away people's civil rights.

You see, in the USA the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the USA guarantees that you cannot be compelled to testify against yourself, but if you use an intermediary to pass messages, and that intermediary keeps a record, well, those records are about you, but they aren't yours. And it's not an unreasonable search, so it's not protected by the 4th Amendment.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 05-04-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Pyeknu - 05-04-2022, 04:39 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Norgarth - 05-04-2022, 05:35 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Jinx999 - 06-24-2022, 11:52 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-24-2022, 12:01 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-24-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-25-2022, 12:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-30-2022, 01:37 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-25-2022, 09:59 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 05:08 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 06-26-2022, 08:22 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-26-2022, 09:18 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-26-2022, 04:04 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 06-26-2022, 11:54 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 07-14-2022, 05:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 08:49 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 10:42 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-11-2022, 05:06 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 05:43 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-17-2022, 06:45 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 08-17-2022, 09:32 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-18-2022, 03:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)