Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Roe v Wade"
RE: "Roe v Wade"
#24
Honestly condoms are over-regulated due to their status as medical devices in the United States. Compare Japan, which has a much greater variety of condoms provided by the free market.

In reference to the other thread, this means I’m actually in line with conservative principles on this one, wanting less regulation and more condoms for everyone! Wait, what do you mean that’s not conservative?

But really, free condoms should be government policy. It solves a lot of economic and resource use problems, and for now extinction or “replacement theory” are not at all problems. Economic growth outpaces population growth. And it’s much cheaper birth control than child car seat policies, which have prevented a thousand times more births than children’s lives saved.
"Kitto daijoubu da yo." - Sakura Kinomoto
Reply


Messages In This Thread
"Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 05-04-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Pyeknu - 05-04-2022, 04:39 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Norgarth - 05-04-2022, 05:35 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Jinx999 - 06-24-2022, 11:52 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-24-2022, 12:01 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-24-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-25-2022, 12:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-30-2022, 01:37 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-25-2022, 09:59 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 05:08 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 06-26-2022, 08:22 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by LynnInDenver - 06-26-2022, 09:18 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 06-26-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 06-26-2022, 04:04 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 06-26-2022, 11:54 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 07-14-2022, 05:45 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 08:14 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 08:49 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-11-2022, 10:42 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-11-2022, 05:06 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by hazard - 08-11-2022, 05:43 PM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by robkelk - 08-17-2022, 06:45 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by classicdrogn - 08-17-2022, 09:32 AM
RE: "Roe v Wade" - by Labster - 08-18-2022, 03:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)