(10-23-2023, 11:41 AM)Bob Schroeck Wrote: Can I please get second opinions on this edit in the Moderation Queue? There's nothing big that automatically merits a rejection, but it has a lot of little things -- some HTML code inserted (or even replacing wiki markup), a lot of examples just inserted wherever in their relevant sections instead of at the ends... nothing that by itself would automatically earn a rejection but... does the combination qualify?
Thanks.
Ouch.
It looks like the edits were made in Microsoft Word, considering the last new link on the page.
At the very least, we need to ask that troper to read the Style Guide.
I'd say "too much work needed to bring the page back into accordance with the Style Guide" and reject with the usual message.
--
Rob Kelk
Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown
Boycotting all products from the USA as long as that country's leader continues to threaten to annex my native country.
Government of Canada: How to immigrate to Canada
Government of Canada: Claiming refugee protection (asylum) from within Canada
Rob Kelk
Sticks and stones can break your bones,
But words can break your heart.
- unknown
Boycotting all products from the USA as long as that country's leader continues to threaten to annex my native country.
Government of Canada: How to immigrate to Canada
Government of Canada: Claiming refugee protection (asylum) from within Canada