Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXX
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXX
I did ask couple stewards, who labeled it "bullshit" and "repulsive", but nonetheless not violating global policy.

Honestly I think the worst part about the review is just how plain uninformative it is. I would say it's only about 15% chance he watched the movie (5% chance all the way); it really didn't seem to resemble anything beyond attacking a cast list on IMDB plus some other people who aren't connected to the movie at all. Superficially it kind of looks like a review, but I don't think it's actually a review of the movie. I'm kind of tempted to delete it for being off-topic.

That's kind of my M.O. in general -- often the offensiveness is a distraction from a deeper problem. This is a propaganda piece disguised as a review. It's a movie about dolls ffs. The emasculating jokes about Ken go back generations, was the movie supposed to not cover that territory? If they had watched it all the way through, wouldn't they talk about the "I'm Just Ken" dance number at the end which is literally about the ways the men are marginalized and forced to conform to masculine stereotypes. There were things to say here on masculine identity, but instead it's calling the director names.
"Kitto daijoubu da yo." - Sakura Kinomoto
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: All The Tropes Wiki Project, Part XXX - by Labster - 10-25-2024, 06:14 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: Bob Schroeck, 42 Guest(s)