Writing this is difficult. I’ll start by saying that I genuinely value your non-problematic edits. You did good work updating and improving aspects of the wiki that had been left untouched or underdeveloped since the fork. I’ll also acknowledge that you chose to approach us to discuss this, rather than attempting to make another alternate account. I often enjoyed reading your edits, and I probably wouldn’t have noticed your alt was using your writing style if I didn’t.
There is no problem with editing pages for works you don’t like. I do it frequently, and I even write pages for works I find distasteful or somewhat disturbing (I may as well get something out of the consumption). Keeping your personal opinions close to your chest is where potential problems arise. My primary concern with letting you back on the wiki is the potential for libel. If you are allowed back on after having a known history of making edits that walk the line, I worry how a court would see the action of letting you edit once again should it come to that. Since this has been an issue in the past, and because you have ignored directives by wiki administrators before, I have a hard time seeing any future where you could be let back on the wiki directly, especially with automoderation, and not risk culpability with letting you back on as a result. Understand that this probably protects you too. I don’t know what it’s like in Brazil, but many countries have punishments for libel if someone pursues the issue and prevails in court. I’m not strictly opposed to your return, but the issues would need to be addressed, and I’m not sure how they could possibly be in a matter that is satisfactory to all parties, including potential litigants. That said, I’m not a lawyer, nor capable of providing legal advice or proper legal analysis, so I would defer to more experienced voices on this.
People do change, and I believe you are being genuine with us. However it hardly any time has passed since your ban. Do you truly want to re-enter troping at this wiki again? There are other trope wikis, and even other non-wiki troping projects online such as /r/topcharactertropes on Reddit. Outside of troping, your skills and experience could make a lot of difference and provide opportunities for personal growth. If I may make a suggestion, have you heard of the academic journal ROMCHIP? They are dedicated to preserving game history in an academic publication, but you yourself don’t need to be an academic to contribute. In fact, as a Brazilian gamer, your perspective and knowledge as a gamer capable of cultural critique is especially valued. If you know a language other than English such as Portuguese or an indigenous language, they also look for translators to help spread gaming knowledge. Your submissions would be subject to review of course, but as a journal, that applies to everyone. Give it some thought and consideration.
There is no problem with editing pages for works you don’t like. I do it frequently, and I even write pages for works I find distasteful or somewhat disturbing (I may as well get something out of the consumption). Keeping your personal opinions close to your chest is where potential problems arise. My primary concern with letting you back on the wiki is the potential for libel. If you are allowed back on after having a known history of making edits that walk the line, I worry how a court would see the action of letting you edit once again should it come to that. Since this has been an issue in the past, and because you have ignored directives by wiki administrators before, I have a hard time seeing any future where you could be let back on the wiki directly, especially with automoderation, and not risk culpability with letting you back on as a result. Understand that this probably protects you too. I don’t know what it’s like in Brazil, but many countries have punishments for libel if someone pursues the issue and prevails in court. I’m not strictly opposed to your return, but the issues would need to be addressed, and I’m not sure how they could possibly be in a matter that is satisfactory to all parties, including potential litigants. That said, I’m not a lawyer, nor capable of providing legal advice or proper legal analysis, so I would defer to more experienced voices on this.
People do change, and I believe you are being genuine with us. However it hardly any time has passed since your ban. Do you truly want to re-enter troping at this wiki again? There are other trope wikis, and even other non-wiki troping projects online such as /r/topcharactertropes on Reddit. Outside of troping, your skills and experience could make a lot of difference and provide opportunities for personal growth. If I may make a suggestion, have you heard of the academic journal ROMCHIP? They are dedicated to preserving game history in an academic publication, but you yourself don’t need to be an academic to contribute. In fact, as a Brazilian gamer, your perspective and knowledge as a gamer capable of cultural critique is especially valued. If you know a language other than English such as Portuguese or an indigenous language, they also look for translators to help spread gaming knowledge. Your submissions would be subject to review of course, but as a journal, that applies to everyone. Give it some thought and consideration.