Quote: Bob Schroeck wrote:E: "Did they... did they just endorse the combination of the JSDF and US Army by showing them as two lesbian lolicons moving in together and holding hands and talking about how 'intimate' they were?"
You know, when I get to the point where this is more than just a learning exercise, I'll certainly make sure it passes. You cite "valid html"
as
though you had a problem, though -- the validation tool in the development environment I was using has no problems with it as it stands; was there something
it
overlooked?
No it's just that I stumbeled across this thread shortly after having an argument with some other people about website design.
They contend that looks is the most important part, as long as it looks good in IE at the resolution they are using it's fine.
To me usability trumps looks, and ideally the site should be browser independent too. A reflowing layout should be used, rather than the fixed with junk so
common on websites.
your website is better than most and most of the problems are cosmetic in nature. I just wanted to state it beforehand so your site doesn't devolve into
one of those sites.
Sorry if I offended, think but this and all is mended....
B: "Have you forgotten so soon? They're phasing out Don't Ask, Don't Tell."