Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another DW-Eva teaser
Re: the thing of it is,
#29
Quote:
It was Shinji's very personal decision to not be a part of the gestalt humanity that was third impact that brought him and presumably asuka back to individuality and the "real" world.
Which was shown only through symbolism and hence should be ignored with contempt.
Sorry, I have issues from being forced to read Hawthorne.
Quote:
So, no matter what kind of advice and support doug tries to give them, they're all set on a course that started a long time ago for them.
I think that there are two classes of Eva fans. First, there are the people who saw the first half of the series and actually started liking the characters and such. Then the ending happened and they went "OUCH!"
Then there are the people who watched the first half of the series and went, "hmm. Robot show. Yawn. But weird shit in the background, interesting." Then the ending happened and they went "Hey, cool, look how subtle and symbolic this is! Wow!"
Symbolism is author-wanking, nothing more. As with self-inserts, it can be interesting if done well and viewed by someone with an open or sufficiently analytical mindset.
I am not open to symbolism, and I prefer not to analyse my entertainment.
Blessed be.
-n
===========

===============================================
"V, did you do something foolish?"
"Yes, and it was glorious."
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Another DW-Eva teaser - by Bob Schroeck - 02-10-2003, 04:38 PM
RE: Teaser - by Valles - 02-10-2003, 06:06 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Bob Schroeck - 02-10-2003, 09:47 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Offsides - 02-10-2003, 09:52 PM
Re: Another DW-Eva teaser - by Logan Darklighter - 02-11-2003, 08:09 AM
Re: Another DW-Eva teaser - by Offsides - 02-11-2003, 09:53 AM
RE: Teaser - by Valles - 02-11-2003, 04:17 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Offsides - 02-11-2003, 08:34 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Valles - 02-11-2003, 09:32 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Bob Schroeck - 02-11-2003, 10:04 PM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Logan Darklighter - 02-12-2003, 03:06 AM
Three little words... - by Guest - 02-12-2003, 06:24 AM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Valles - 02-12-2003, 07:05 AM
Re: RE: Teaser - by Bob Schroeck - 02-12-2003, 09:03 AM
Let me just say... - by ECSNorway - 02-12-2003, 11:39 PM
Hm. - by ECSNorway - 02-16-2003, 08:30 AM
Re: Hm. - by Rod.H - 02-16-2003, 10:22 AM
Once again, with feeling... - by ECSNorway - 02-18-2003, 10:53 PM
Re: Hm. - by Bob Schroeck - 02-19-2003, 05:14 PM
Re: Hm. - by Valles - 02-19-2003, 06:39 PM
Re: Hm. - by Star Ranger4 - 02-20-2003, 08:22 AM
Re: Hm. - by Bob Schroeck - 02-20-2003, 04:43 PM
please don't hit me . . . - by Murmur the Fallen - 02-22-2003, 09:23 AM
Re: please don't hit me . . . - by Offsides - 02-22-2003, 10:09 AM
Re: please don't hit me . . . - by Star Ranger4 - 02-23-2003, 08:46 AM
Re: please don't hit me . . . - by Bob Schroeck - 02-23-2003, 09:02 PM
the thing of it is, - by Murmur the Fallen - 02-26-2003, 04:00 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Valles - 02-26-2003, 06:14 PM
Re:Re: the thing of it is, - by Rod.H - 02-26-2003, 07:42 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Offsides - 02-26-2003, 09:20 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Bob Schroeck - 02-26-2003, 10:10 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Bob Schroeck - 02-26-2003, 10:15 PM
Re: Re:Re: the thing of it is, - by Bob Schroeck - 02-26-2003, 10:17 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Bob Schroeck - 02-26-2003, 10:21 PM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Offsides - 02-26-2003, 10:42 PM
Overall quote. - by Guest - 02-27-2003, 08:52 AM
Re: the thing of it is, - by Star Ranger4 - 02-27-2003, 09:43 AM
Re: Overall quote. - by Offsides - 02-27-2003, 10:26 AM
Re: Overall quote. - by Guest - 02-27-2003, 07:23 PM
Re: Overall quote. - by Bob Schroeck - 02-27-2003, 10:03 PM
"where's your pariah now?" "stuck in an anti- - by Murmur the Fallen - 02-28-2003, 02:16 AM
Just a FYI.... - by Slacker - 04-12-2003, 11:50 AM
Re: Just a FYI.... - by Offsides - 04-12-2003, 04:39 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)