Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not To Be Taken Seriously
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously
#15
Quote:
Whoa. I think even Doug's pop culture databank might draw the line at obscure Canadian references, Rob.
But it's such a good line...
Quote:
Which is not to say that I don't like it -- I do, it's a perfect kind of ref for Doug to make. I'd have to figure out when he got enough exposure to internalize it for quoting, though...
Presumably one of those many untold steps between DW III and DW IV was in a 1970s-1980s Canada, and Doug was so bored he started listening to public radio on the weekends just to pass the time...
Quote:
The thing is, though, this idea of mine was to have Fenspace happen after Doug departs, unaware of what he has wrought, as usual.
Ah, right... but we've gotten into such a quarrel over Haruhi that I didn't want to muddy the waters further by presenting a conflicting hypothesis for 'wavium - especially as a fait accomplai.
But there's always the possibility that Doug had been to Fenspace before - a classical drunkard's walk occasionally doubles back on itself, so why shouldn't this Drunkard's Walk do the same thing? It's not as if there aren't enough Gate songs proposed in The Game for this to be practical.
Quote:
Oh, and I haven't forgotten the list of GGG participants. I've been sick the last few days, and have only sporadically worked on it. I am, however, up to DW11... so I'm almost done.
Okay, thanks. I assume people don't show up from Staggers, or else there's going to be far too many characters to keep track of. (And the thought of characters from Crossroads, A Day In The Life, and Audience Participation interacting with each other, let alone the rest of the motley crew, hurts my brain...)

-Rob Kelk
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 05-31-2007, 02:15 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by CattyNebulart - 05-31-2007, 09:02 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Herr Bad Moon - 05-31-2007, 09:18 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-01-2007, 12:47 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-01-2007, 04:14 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-01-2007, 03:16 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-01-2007, 07:04 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-05-2007, 12:50 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-05-2007, 01:27 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 06-05-2007, 02:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-05-2007, 03:26 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-05-2007, 04:40 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-05-2007, 05:03 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-06-2007, 02:03 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-06-2007, 03:21 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-06-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-06-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by M Fnord - 06-06-2007, 11:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-13-2007, 12:52 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 02:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-13-2007, 02:42 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 06-13-2007, 06:59 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-13-2007, 07:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 01:10 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 01:14 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-13-2007, 03:23 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Valles - 06-13-2007, 03:54 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 06:58 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-14-2007, 01:04 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-14-2007, 03:52 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-14-2007, 03:08 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-14-2007, 05:26 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-14-2007, 06:46 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-15-2007, 02:05 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-15-2007, 05:03 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-15-2007, 06:45 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-15-2007, 02:32 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-15-2007, 04:56 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-15-2007, 06:48 PM
hm - by Foxboy - 06-15-2007, 10:16 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:49 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:56 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:59 AM
Pinafore - by Foxboy - 06-16-2007, 05:16 AM
Senshi Faction Ideas - by Epsilon - 06-16-2007, 06:28 AM
Re: Pinafore - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 05:08 PM
Re: Pinafore - by KJ - 06-17-2007, 06:20 AM
Re: Pinafore - by Bob Schroeck - 06-17-2007, 05:05 PM
Re: Pinafore - by Kokuten - 06-18-2007, 07:55 AM
re: Existing Sailors - by Foxboy - 06-18-2007, 03:03 PM
Re: Pinafore - by robkelk - 06-18-2007, 04:12 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-20-2007, 12:52 AM
Re: Pinafore - by Ebony - 06-25-2007, 10:27 PM
Re: Pinafore - by ECSNorway - 06-26-2007, 07:34 PM
Re: Pinafore - by Ebony - 06-27-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-25-2007, 12:39 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-27-2007, 12:13 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 03:42 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 07-31-2007, 03:49 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 03:50 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by M Fnord - 07-31-2007, 04:28 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 04:39 AM
Concordance - by Foxboy - 07-31-2007, 02:10 PM
Re: Concordance - by Bob Schroeck - 07-31-2007, 02:13 PM
Re: Concordance - by Ebony - 07-31-2007, 04:40 PM
Re: Concordance - by robkelk - 08-01-2007, 12:48 AM
Re: Concordance - by CattyNebulart - 08-04-2007, 11:24 PM
Re: Concordance - by Kokuten - 08-15-2007, 06:49 AM
Re: Concordance - by robkelk - 08-15-2007, 11:12 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-16-2009, 05:44 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-19-2009, 02:27 PM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-19-2009, 06:05 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 03:40 AM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-24-2009, 04:03 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 04:07 AM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-24-2009, 04:08 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 04:11 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 01:43 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 09-07-2009, 02:57 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 06:05 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 06:18 PM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 09-08-2009, 05:05 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-08-2009, 04:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)