Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not To Be Taken Seriously
Re: Legend of Galactic Girls Commentary
#71
Quote:
Foreshadowing and referencing back to Crystal Osaka for Crystal Paris is neat.
Thanks.
Noah won't be explaining nearly as much in the remaining chapters. (You can take that as a hint if you wish.)

I started chapter 3 yesterday, and got it up to about 6k. (It would have been longer, but I needed to double-check DW V chapter 1 for whether I could do something I wanted to do. It looks like maybe I can...)
Edit:
Quote:
Stelliva has got to be the only station with copyright permission.
One of the few...
Quote:
Well, The Blue Blazers on World Watch One know what really happened.
The Blazers, the folks on Grover's Corners, at least two of the Senshi (maybe), some other folks who will be shown in chapters 4 and 5... This is probably going to end up becoming one of the Great Conspiracy Theories Of Fenspace. Noah's going to hate that, and (as shown in one of Comrade Fnord's stories) Sora's going to run away from it. This story is one of Stellvia's "defining moments".
-Rob Kelk
"Actually, my goal is to write neat stories. The money just makes it possible for me to write them faster and then buy neat toys."
Ryk E. Spoor, 7 November 2007
--
Rob Kelk
"Governments have no right to question the loyalty of those who oppose
them. Adversaries remain citizens of the same state, common subjects of
the same sovereign, servants of the same law."

- Michael Ignatieff, addressing Stanford University in 2012
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 05-31-2007, 02:15 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by CattyNebulart - 05-31-2007, 09:02 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Herr Bad Moon - 05-31-2007, 09:18 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-01-2007, 12:47 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-01-2007, 04:14 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-01-2007, 03:16 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-01-2007, 07:04 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-05-2007, 12:50 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-05-2007, 01:27 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 06-05-2007, 02:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-05-2007, 03:26 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-05-2007, 04:40 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-05-2007, 05:03 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-06-2007, 02:03 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-06-2007, 03:21 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-06-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-06-2007, 11:53 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by M Fnord - 06-06-2007, 11:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-13-2007, 12:52 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 02:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-13-2007, 02:42 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 06-13-2007, 06:59 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-13-2007, 07:22 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 01:10 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 01:14 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-13-2007, 03:23 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Valles - 06-13-2007, 03:54 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-13-2007, 06:58 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-14-2007, 01:04 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-14-2007, 03:52 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-14-2007, 03:08 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-14-2007, 05:26 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-14-2007, 06:46 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-15-2007, 02:05 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-15-2007, 05:03 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Kokuten - 06-15-2007, 06:45 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-15-2007, 02:32 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Ebony - 06-15-2007, 04:56 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Bob Schroeck - 06-15-2007, 06:48 PM
hm - by Foxboy - 06-15-2007, 10:16 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:49 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:56 AM
Re: hm - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 03:59 AM
Pinafore - by Foxboy - 06-16-2007, 05:16 AM
Senshi Faction Ideas - by Epsilon - 06-16-2007, 06:28 AM
Re: Pinafore - by robkelk - 06-16-2007, 05:08 PM
Re: Pinafore - by KJ - 06-17-2007, 06:20 AM
Re: Pinafore - by Bob Schroeck - 06-17-2007, 05:05 PM
Re: Pinafore - by Kokuten - 06-18-2007, 07:55 AM
re: Existing Sailors - by Foxboy - 06-18-2007, 03:03 PM
Re: Pinafore - by robkelk - 06-18-2007, 04:12 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 06-20-2007, 12:52 AM
Re: Pinafore - by Ebony - 06-25-2007, 10:27 PM
Re: Pinafore - by ECSNorway - 06-26-2007, 07:34 PM
Re: Pinafore - by Ebony - 06-27-2007, 06:55 PM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-25-2007, 12:39 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-27-2007, 12:13 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 03:42 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by Norgarth - 07-31-2007, 03:49 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 03:50 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by M Fnord - 07-31-2007, 04:28 AM
Re: Not To Be Taken Seriously - by robkelk - 07-31-2007, 04:39 AM
Concordance - by Foxboy - 07-31-2007, 02:10 PM
Re: Concordance - by Bob Schroeck - 07-31-2007, 02:13 PM
Re: Concordance - by Ebony - 07-31-2007, 04:40 PM
Re: Concordance - by robkelk - 08-01-2007, 12:48 AM
Re: Concordance - by CattyNebulart - 08-04-2007, 11:24 PM
Re: Concordance - by Kokuten - 08-15-2007, 06:49 AM
Re: Concordance - by robkelk - 08-15-2007, 11:12 PM
Re: Legend of Galactic Girls Commentary - by robkelk - 12-12-2007, 04:16 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-16-2009, 05:44 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-19-2009, 02:27 PM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-19-2009, 06:05 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 03:40 AM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-24-2009, 04:03 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 04:07 AM
[No subject] - by M Fnord - 08-24-2009, 04:08 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 08-24-2009, 04:11 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 01:43 AM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 09-07-2009, 02:57 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 06:05 PM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-07-2009, 06:18 PM
[No subject] - by Black Aeronaut - 09-08-2009, 05:05 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-08-2009, 04:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)