The easiest way for stopping the Overfan coming about is to keep the evidence contradictory (in a 'This PROVES the Overfan exists!' to 'This PROVES the Overfan DOESN'T exist!') and inconclusive.
In Haruni's case, it could easily be used as an argument for, against, or of a distraction from, the existence of the Overfan.
Depending on how we pull the reveal (and how much we reveal), it could be all of the above.
In Haruni's case, it could easily be used as an argument for, against, or of a distraction from, the existence of the Overfan.
Depending on how we pull the reveal (and how much we reveal), it could be all of the above.