So you've gone for a aerospace-capable design instead of a pure space design this time. Nice.
But a 200m wingspan? Yikes! Definately not going to be seeing one in a standard airport. The differenciation between sublight and FTL drive I expect to be a
Trekkie design quirk. And in my opinion she's too lightly armed, even for an explorer. Personally. I'd increase the point-defence arrays to at least 4
(dorsal and ventral port and starbord) and probably up to eight (add nose, tail, and outboard both wingtips), and add a rear facing launcher. But that's
just me.
And you've finally got a carrier aircraft for when you need to pick Ptichka up. Cool.
Given their launch dates, I expect no Gagarin-class ship will be involved in Serenity Valley?
WRT MediaWiki markup: I assume you're occasionally playing with this still. The shipbox construct looks interesting IMO.
But a 200m wingspan? Yikes! Definately not going to be seeing one in a standard airport. The differenciation between sublight and FTL drive I expect to be a
Trekkie design quirk. And in my opinion she's too lightly armed, even for an explorer. Personally. I'd increase the point-defence arrays to at least 4
(dorsal and ventral port and starbord) and probably up to eight (add nose, tail, and outboard both wingtips), and add a rear facing launcher. But that's
just me.
And you've finally got a carrier aircraft for when you need to pick Ptichka up. Cool.
Given their launch dates, I expect no Gagarin-class ship will be involved in Serenity Valley?
WRT MediaWiki markup: I assume you're occasionally playing with this still. The shipbox construct looks interesting IMO.