PEPPER: The strategic stuff is fiddly - I'd want to define it in terms of output, but then there's people coming up with treaty weapons and junk. My intent was also to have the hard limit met by rotating excess capability into the $GJ TOE if people don't want to scrap or demil them; "we don't have them, they're the Convention's until they rotate out and this one is the Convention's" and in exchange maybe the requirements for demilling be a bit "harder". You could argue that some stuff is a strategic asset when loaded one way and not when it's loaded another way - I don't like the idea of that flying if it can swap between one state to the other fairly readily. Population might be a viable metric but I dunno; that's a can of worms and a half. It works for me but I'd be open to what other people have to say. Inspectors I think I had in mind before... some line being drawn between operational stuff and research stuff too.
Charter: Can't think of any objections or addendums right off the bat.
Charter: Can't think of any objections or addendums right off the bat.