Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[RFC] M-35 Mako
 
#7
robkelk Wrote:
Quote:I would say that the Mako is good at resisting continuous pressure, but not really good against weapon fire. Different kind of "damage".
Allow me to re-phrase: How does this vehicle have better armour than Crystal Osaka did?

Edit: Ninja'ed!

100 atmospheres of pressure can be blocked indefinitely with Earth 2012 tech... without handwavium. But it depends on the structure of the "vehicle".

I would assume that Crystal Osaka had too large hollow areas and not enough structural stability.

but lets drop the Venus idea.

(edit)

Any opinion about the vehicle itself? Wink

(edit2)

Maybe there can be a specialized "pressure resistance optimized" Mako later as a one-of-a-kind. Still, the heat will prevent it to stay down there longer.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[RFC] M-35 Mako - by HRogge - 09-29-2012, 10:26 PM
[No subject] - by ECSNorway - 09-29-2012, 11:44 PM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-29-2012, 11:55 PM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 12:09 AM
[No subject] - by robkelk - 09-30-2012, 12:18 AM
[No subject] - by Ace Dreamer - 09-30-2012, 12:21 AM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 12:21 AM
[No subject] - by Ace Dreamer - 09-30-2012, 01:03 AM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 01:13 AM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 01:47 AM
[No subject] - by Ace Dreamer - 09-30-2012, 02:14 AM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 02:18 AM
[No subject] - by Ace Dreamer - 09-30-2012, 02:27 PM
[No subject] - by HRogge - 09-30-2012, 02:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)