Where am I bullshitting? McKitrick and McIntyre managed to deconstruct the Mann-Bradley-Hughes climate model pretty well in their papers. Wahl and Ammann, as shown in these charts (b and c specificially), declare their reconstruction (Using ring data from 1400BCE series trees, it pans out better if they use data added in with the 1450BCE series trees) of the MBH model without merit if it does not use the bristlecone/foxtail series. The National Academy of Sciences has agreed that treering samples from strip-bark sites should be avoided in temperature reconstructions.
And you are absolutely correct, evolution is a fine example of the consensus being wrong. It is also a fine example of the evolution (Ha!) seen in science around Darwin's period, where we went from looking for a god's hand in the works to a purely factual approach. Yay scientific method.
And you are absolutely correct, evolution is a fine example of the consensus being wrong. It is also a fine example of the evolution (Ha!) seen in science around Darwin's period, where we went from looking for a god's hand in the works to a purely factual approach. Yay scientific method.