I'm not sure, but it seems like the Marxist thing might originate from the radio show described here.
Which was, it should be noted, in 2001.
It doesn't look too unreasonable to call some of that socialist. I've no idea whether it's Marxist or not.
Still, seven years is enough time for someone's views to change. We'll have opportunity to find out what he thinks *now* soon enough.
I wouldn't call that a direct comparison. At least, I don't see saying "this person has a philosophy that in the past, has been pursued in ways that lead to mass death" the same as saying "this person would consider mass death acceptable in pursuit of their philosophy".
Which isn't to say I see the point of the line in the first place. '.'
-Morgan.
Which was, it should be noted, in 2001.
It doesn't look too unreasonable to call some of that socialist. I've no idea whether it's Marxist or not.
Still, seven years is enough time for someone's views to change. We'll have opportunity to find out what he thinks *now* soon enough.
Quote:How DARE you support someone who directly compares the Democratic Party and over half the voting American public to the likes of Stalin and Mao.
I wouldn't call that a direct comparison. At least, I don't see saying "this person has a philosophy that in the past, has been pursued in ways that lead to mass death" the same as saying "this person would consider mass death acceptable in pursuit of their philosophy".
Which isn't to say I see the point of the line in the first place. '.'
-Morgan.