That'd be the question, wouldn't it?
That's 18% or so higher than the total percentage. This suggests that there is some factor influencing them to vote yes that is not as large an influence
on other groups. (Or perhaps some factor inducing other groups to vote no is absent, or some more involved situation.) Finding out what this factor is might be
interesting.
The logic works the same for pretty much any subgroup that doesn't directly align it's members with one position or the other. (One suspects that the
population of homosexuals who have or want to get married is pretty close to 100% voting no, and the reasons why are obvious, therefore uninteresting.)
What might make this particular group interesting is that there *is* no inherent reason why a person's skin color should influence how they vote.
-Morgan.
That's 18% or so higher than the total percentage. This suggests that there is some factor influencing them to vote yes that is not as large an influence
on other groups. (Or perhaps some factor inducing other groups to vote no is absent, or some more involved situation.) Finding out what this factor is might be
interesting.
The logic works the same for pretty much any subgroup that doesn't directly align it's members with one position or the other. (One suspects that the
population of homosexuals who have or want to get married is pretty close to 100% voting no, and the reasons why are obvious, therefore uninteresting.)
What might make this particular group interesting is that there *is* no inherent reason why a person's skin color should influence how they vote.
-Morgan.