I disagree. If a cop that is occupied with another matter orders me to break into
someone's house because it is in fire and I refuse I'm at least morally responsible
if anyone dies on account of it. Also if I agree and haul someone out I shouldn't be
sued by that person on account I was under order. Now they could sue the police
for giving the order but I'm protected.
The same applies to the tele groups. They went on good faith that they were not
breaking the law and if they were it was a matter of national security. Also they didin't
want to be the 'ones that let the terrorist kill people' . Now I think people could sue the
goverment but not the companies that complied since it was the goverment that ordered
it.
someone's house because it is in fire and I refuse I'm at least morally responsible
if anyone dies on account of it. Also if I agree and haul someone out I shouldn't be
sued by that person on account I was under order. Now they could sue the police
for giving the order but I'm protected.
The same applies to the tele groups. They went on good faith that they were not
breaking the law and if they were it was a matter of national security. Also they didin't
want to be the 'ones that let the terrorist kill people' . Now I think people could sue the
goverment but not the companies that complied since it was the goverment that ordered
it.