Just So You Don't Think I'm Biased

[Fidoohki]

Okay let's take them one at a time:




Oklahoma City bombing: No foriegn ties. This was a home grown and entirely internal matter that fell squarely under the juristiction of US Law.

Are you claiming that wiretapping of US domestic media outlets does not also fall squarely under the juristiction of US Law?

Did you read what the wiretapping controvery was about? However if this did happen then the media outlets have the recourse

of suing the goverment. BTW can someone point me to which specific media outlets were

wiretapped?

First WTC attack:Because it failed. Imagine if it had succeeded....

That's all we can do - "imagine".

While you may be comfortable with lucky breaks I'm not.

War of 1812: Different times different rules ((Just thought I'd throw that in there.)

Same Constitution, though.

No it wasn't. The Constitution of 1812 considered only White males as 'free'. We've come a long way since then.

Clinton years: He never faced a successfull attack on US soil, however did not effectively go after them .

Why should he go after somebody that hadn't effectively attacked the country under his watch? Is it the policy of the USA to attack
countries that have not yet attacked it?




(looks at the current mess in Iraq)




Never mind... stupid question.

In 1998, Two US embassies in Africa were attacked by grenades. The attackers members of Al Quaeda.