I guess I don't quite understand the logic. Because I look at it and think "Okay, so there's one side that has soldiers with guns. And there's one side that also has soldiers with guns, and civilians with guns (some of whom are, in fact, retired soldiers with guns). I think the second side has a lot more guns."
Basically I don't see an armed populace as something that could be safely ignored, unless they're willing to just glass the country and start over.
-Morgan.
Basically I don't see an armed populace as something that could be safely ignored, unless they're willing to just glass the country and start over.
-Morgan.