When evaluating a conspiracy theory, it is worth asking yourself:
1) How many people would be required to make a conspiracy like this work?
2) Does the conspiracy involve blatantly immoral acts, such as deliberately lying about the death of people you are sworn to defend, which would make anyone involved likely to betray the conspiacy or act as a wistleblower?
If the answer to 2 is "yes" and the answer to 1 is ">3", then it pretty safe to dismiss the conspiracy out of hand.
The other thing you need to do is evaluate the source of the theory. And, frankly, a website with an agenda is not a good source, unless they're pointing at a souce you do consider trustworthy. And their sources (especially Brewerstroupe) are, frankly, about as untrustworthy as you can get.
1) How many people would be required to make a conspiracy like this work?
2) Does the conspiracy involve blatantly immoral acts, such as deliberately lying about the death of people you are sworn to defend, which would make anyone involved likely to betray the conspiacy or act as a wistleblower?
If the answer to 2 is "yes" and the answer to 1 is ">3", then it pretty safe to dismiss the conspiracy out of hand.
The other thing you need to do is evaluate the source of the theory. And, frankly, a website with an agenda is not a good source, unless they're pointing at a souce you do consider trustworthy. And their sources (especially Brewerstroupe) are, frankly, about as untrustworthy as you can get.