I think the idea is supposed to be that the kill-on-sight orders from the US government are in theory* supposed to be a proportionate response - the idea was to kill someone who was either directly or by proxy trying to kill US citizens.
Molly Norris, on the other hand, made a comic that some consider in poor taste, which is not traditionally a crime that carries the death penalty. Disproportionate response.
*I'm pretty sure I saw a thread already about the practice part, yes?
-Morgan... and the staff of Morgan & Antares make no comments about whether the kill-on-sight orders actually are proportionate response, because the point is about the intent of the people who actually -did- it.
Molly Norris, on the other hand, made a comic that some consider in poor taste, which is not traditionally a crime that carries the death penalty. Disproportionate response.
*I'm pretty sure I saw a thread already about the practice part, yes?
-Morgan... and the staff of Morgan & Antares make no comments about whether the kill-on-sight orders actually are proportionate response, because the point is about the intent of the people who actually -did- it.