Any sufficiently motivated fraudster, with the skills to actually hack the voting machines to produce the results he wants, would not be so silly as to leave the fraud obvious to the casual user of said machines. Not if he wanted to actually get away with it. In this case I am inclined to trust the old saw, "do not attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity." We've seen dumb and dumber design decisions in electronic voting machines before, exacerbated by the arrogance of the manufacturers and their refusal to let outsiders audit the design and construction process. I'm willing to bet that this is just another case of stupid design error making the machines do something weird and unexpected.
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.
-- Bob
---------
Then the horns kicked in...
...and my shoes began to squeak.